Based solely on first-half stats, Sean chose the all-time Nats All-Star team.Read More
With the MLB trade deadline around the corner, David Huzzard and Alyssa Wolice discuss whether or not the Washington Nationals will land a big name. Also, should Nats fans brace themselves for disappointment?Read More
Hope you had a good 4th of July. Mine was pretty good until the illegal fireworks started getting set off and my dogs freaked out. There really isn’t much big Nats news from over the weekend. The Nats had a winning streak but that ended. They signed a bunch of teenagers to large contracts. It’s really hard to get excited about international signings. It’s the most the Nats have ever spent and they got some top ranked guys but they’re 16 and so far away from the majors.
Did you realize that 16 year olds were born in the year 2000? We’re a couple seasons away from having a major league baseball player that was born in the year 2000 and that is scary. Back to the international signing period and it’s lack of ability to excite people. The draft is somewhat exciting when you’re favorite team has the top pick and it’s a year that Stephen Strasburg or Bryce Harper are available. Those guys were hyped up and publicized long before the draft. I don’t even know who the first overall pick was this year and if the Nats pick weren’t related to a prospect already in their system I wouldn’t have remembered him either.
Now amplify how unknown the players are in the draft times a thousand and that is the international signing period. The players drafted at least have college or high school stats and accomplishments to list. The players signed as international free agents are just kids and a lot of them aren’t even playing with regulation baseball equipment. It makes a great story when they make it to the majors but for me, the common fan, to get excited about them at this stage is impossible.
Look at Victor Robles. He is on the fast track to the majors having just been promoted to Potomac and if he makes a two level jump again next season he has a chance to be a September call-up in 2017, and even that feels like too far away to get excited about. Part of it has to do with the Nats being good. The farm system was much more exciting when it was something that was going to save the team. Take Turner and Giolito for example. Giolito is the top prospect in all of baseball. The same as Strasburg and Harper and yet his debut and arrival to the majors was met with a hundredth of the excitement, and for Turner there is a segment of fans that don’t even want him in the majors.
Waiting for players like Robles, Turner, and Giolito is how Nats fans used to get their jollies. Now it’s turned to almost an extreme of some thinking call-ups will ruin team chemistry and send the Nats spiraling out of control. I think we can find a balance of being excited for the arrival of hot prospects and watching the team have success at the top level because they’re so interconnected, and in order to sustain success the Nats are going to have to keep increasing the power of the farm system.
Also before I close this out Zack Hample is an asshole.
After the Washington Nationals capped off their losing streak at seven games, David Huzzard and Alyssa Wolice ask what is the bigger issue - the Nats' bullpen, or their offense?Read More
With a full crew in studio the Citizens discuss the last few weeks in Nats news, start looking towards what upgrades could be made via trade, and somehow end up discussing The Purge and income taxes.
With Jonathan Papelbon on the 15-day disabled list with a right intercostal strain, the Washington Nationals have an even greater impetus to pad their bullpen. Citizens of Natstown's David Huzzard and Alyssa Wolice offer their takes on what the Nats should do to regain late-innings strength: namely, should the Nats take a shot at landing Aroldis Chapman?Read More
The Nats lost 3-1 on Thursday evening, but it was still a productive night, as they added three solid prospects to the organization on Day 1 of the MLB draft. The addition of Daniel Murphy and the subtraction of Ian Desmond and Jordan Zimmermann left the Nationals with back-to-back picks at #28 and #29, as well as pick #58.Read More
Sean takes a look at how some Nats prospects are doing this season - 39 to be exact.Read More
After a week off to watch hockey, the Citizens return to talk the last two weeks in Nats baseball, the Strasburg extension, the Harper suspension, and more before digressing into a good 30 minute discussion about Captain America: Civil War.
Six national websites and two Nationals websites have released their prospect rankings for the Nationals system. Sean takes a look at the overall averages and outliers between the rankings.Read More
The Citizens return to talk the last few weeks of Nats baseball and play a game of Good/Bad/Indifferent and Real or Fun Small Sample Sizes.
The 2012 Washington Nationals were 14-4 through their first 18 games before finishing the month of April at 14-8. It was the best start in the brief history of the Washington Nationals and everyone remembers how the 2012 regular season turned out. The Washington Nationals were the best team in baseball and the division race was never really all that close despite our mid-season fits of panic. 2016 is off to much the same start record wise but this is a very different Nationals team.
The early 2012 Washington Nationals struggled to score runs, and there best offensive weapon was the wild pitch. They were beating the teams they were supposed to beat like the 2016 Nationals but they were doing it because of great starting pitching and the other teams incompetence. John Ryan Murphy throwing away a bunt attempt that was heading foul was a bit of 2012 Nats leaking through but the Nats also scored five other runs in that game one of them being a ninth inning pinch hit home run by Bryce Harper. The 2012 Nationals were the twelfth ranked team in run production in the NL in the month of April. The 2016 Washington Nationals are currently eighth in the NL in runs scored per game. It's a slightly better offense and one that certainly looks to be scoring more because of their own skill than the 2012 team.
The 2016 Washington Nationals are also good at preventing runs. They have gotten stellar starting pitching and the defense has been much better than anytime in the past. It is hard to say how much of this is owed to Dusty Baker but my estimation would be it's a fair amount. Davey Johnson wasn't a preparation manager and Matt Williams talked about doing a lot of things but never really did them. So far in the 2016 season the Washington Nationals are showing up to games ready to play and not beating themselves with defensive errors. It is in these small but important things that show up over the course of a season that separates an experienced manager from one in over his head.
In 2014 Matt Williams was handed the keys to a Ferrari and asked to drive straight. Not much went wrong and he accomplished that task until the playoffs. Matt Williams big mistakes in 2014 came with dealing with Bryce Harper and as it would later turn out handing too much control over to Jayson Werth. Dusty Baker from the beginning has let it be known that he and he alone is in charge of the Washington Nationals clubhouse. It's hard to say how much of an impact this has on winning but I'd imagine it's much better to show up to a healthy working environment than the toxic one created by Matt Williams. Even in 2014 not everything was peaceful. There were unnamed veterans and Kevin Frandsen throwing Bryce Harper under the bus and questioning his position on the team. Bryce Harper's play has erased a lot of that but Dusty Baker has never even let the question arise as to who this team revolves around.
Dusty Baker doesn't manage by the book or by The Book. He has always done his own thing and he's been very successful doing it. His critics never bother to question themselves or their thinking and wonder how Dusty Baker has been so successful for so many years and with so many different teams. Seeing it up close it is apparent. Dusty Baker comes across as a players manager but is as strict and rule oriented as any hard nosed manager. His players buy in to scheduled days off, charting pitches, and whatever else they do to be prepared to play every day. This is the most focused and prepared Nationals team I've ever seen and the entire 25 man roster is involved on a weekly basis. Matt Williams was given the keys to a Ferrari and wrecked it. Dusty Baker has his critics and his flaws, but he at least knows how to drive stick.
This offseason, although they never officially said so, the Nationals placed a clear emphasis on trying to bring in some more contact hitters, guys who profiled completely differently from the standard Nationals hitter. To those ends, they brought in Daniel Murphy who had a career 88.8 percent contact rate and Ben Revere who has a career 91.8 percent contact rate. Murphy also was a free swinger, with a swing rate of 49.4 percent in 2015, a combination that made him unique among Nationals players.
However, no one told Daniel Murphy the Nationals' plan when they signed him, because during his time in Washington he's been a completely different hitter. He's mashing home runs, doubles and even triples like he's Bryce Harper while taking a walk in 12.5 percent of his plate appearances, double his career high. Through 14 games he's been one of the best hitters in baseball and nothing like the regular Murphy.
If that sounds familiar, it's also what he did through the first rounds of the playoffs in 2015. Back in October most chalked it up to a lucky fluke. Some who follow the Mets more closely said he made a change in his swing, which has carried over to this year. Here I've created a side-by-side gif of Murphy hitting a double in 2015 and a triple in 2016 on pitches both up and over the middle of the strikezone.
While his hands might be starting very slightly closer to his body, the overall swing seems identical, so I don't think that's the change. It seems Murphy's increased power hasn't come from his swing, but rather from his approach.
And the change might have come in those same "flukey" playoffs. In September 2015, Murphy was still putting up his usual plate discipline numbers with a swing rate of 48.5 percent and a contact rate of 92.1 percent. But then something changed in October, Murphy saw 108 pitches (less than 1/20th the amount seen in a regular season), and he swung at just 43.4 percent and made contact with only 84.3 percent. Not huge differences, but a difference nonetheless.
A difference that has seemingly been kept up through 2016, where he has so far swung at just 44 percent of pitches seen and made contact with only 79.1 percent, a substantial drop from his career high just last season. According to David Procter who helpfully tweeted me, Murphy admitted in a MASN interview that he has made a conscious decision to swing less and try to only make harder contact.
So has it worked? Hard to say, since Murphy's only had 57 plate appearances and has a wRC+ 20 points higher than Bryce Harper's 2015, something unlikely to last. And if it does last, you really have to wonder why it took him seven years to make the change. His underlying batted ball numbers aren't much help either, his average batted ball velocity is exactly the same in 2016 as it was in 2015, 90.6 miles per hour. FanGraphs says his hard contact rate has increased by 5.6 percent over last year, but it's still too early to put much stock in that, if you should at all.
What we do know is that this change has ruined the Nationals' plan to increase lineup diversity. In 2015 the Nationals as a team swung at 46.4 percent of the pitches they saw and made contact on 77.3 percent of their swings, 2014 those numbers were 44.7 percent and 78.9 percent. You might also recognize those numbers as almost exactly what Murphy has put up. Apparently he's a big subscriber to the When in Rome saying.
The Nats are good this year. So have their minor league teams.Read More
Back to a (mostly) weekly schedule the Citizens return to discuss Opening Day, Revere's injury, Turner/Giolito scenarios, how the Diamondbacks love trading first round picks, and somehow find our way to Breakfast At Tiffany's.
Every year an intrepid group of bloggers puts together predictions for the sole purpose of having others look back later and let them know just how wrong they were. These are their stories.Read More
BREAKING: There are at least 100 prospects in the Nats' system. Maybe even 101 or 102. Our own Sean Hogan investigates at 11.Read More
Jose Lobaton was all but guaranteed a returning role as the Washington Nationals’ backup catcher once the Nats signed him to a one-year deal for just under $1.4 million this past December.
Known to be much more of a defensive asset rather than a contributor from the batter’s box, Lobaton made just 155 plate appearances last season, during which he recorded a .199 batting average and .279 on-base percentage. Offensively, both output and the number of opportunities afforded Lobaton have been in steady decline since 2013, a year in which he pulled a .249 batting average in 311 appearances.
But, when the Nats acquired him along with southpaw Felipe Rivero and outfielder Drew Vettleson in a deal that sent right-hander Nathan Karns to Tampa Bay, they praised Lobaton’s work behind the plate – namely, his ability to frame pitches and buy strikes.Read More
Well here we are less than a week from Opening Day and Jonathan Papelbon is still a National. Back at the end of September I'd guess few would expect that to be the case, however we had a good idea after the Drew Storen trade in January that he would be sticking around for another year.
And with those sentences let's move on from the already well-discussed topic of Papelbon's transgressions last season and on to a proper preview of what we can expect from him on the mound this year.Read More
The Nationals have some good prospects. Sean Hogan wrote about them. You should come read about them.Read More